A Note from Pastor James:
This paper reflects the biblical teaching presented in this morning’s message regarding baptism and church membership.
Our current bylaws recommend believer’s baptism but do not require it for membership. As a church, we will be discussing this matter together at our upcoming business meeting.
This paper is provided to help you prayerfully consider what Scripture teaches as we move forward together.
Introduction
This paper does not seek to reopen the question of how a person is saved. Scripture settles that matter with unshakable clarity: salvation is by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone. The question before us is narrower, but no less urgent:
Should a local church formally recognize as members those who have not followed Christ in believer’s baptism?
Our current bylaws recommend baptism but do not require it. While well-intentioned, this posture creates a category the New Testament simply does not recognize: a settled, fully participating church member who remains deliberately unbaptized. This paper argues that believer’s baptism ought to be required for church membership, not as a condition of salvation, but as a matter of biblical order, obedient discipleship, and ecclesial clarity.
Baptism Is Not Necessary for Salvation
Before addressing church membership, we must state plainly what Scripture affirms: baptism does not save. Salvation is entirely a work of God’s grace, received through faith in the finished work of Christ (Eph. 2:8–9; Titus 3:5). The thief on the cross entered paradise without water baptism. The apostle Paul consistently distinguishes the gospel from the sign, even noting that Christ “did not send me to baptize but to preach the gospel” (1 Cor. 1:17). Peter clarifies that baptism “now saves you” not as “a removal of dirt from the body, but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ” (1 Pet. 3:21). It is the outward pledge of an inward reality already wrought by grace.
To conflate baptism with regeneration is to distort the gospel. To treat it as optional, however, is to ignore the clear posture of the New Testament believer. Salvation is free; obedience is not negotiable.
The New Testament Pattern: Faith, Baptism, Addition
From the church’s birth in Acts 2, a consistent pattern emerges. When the crowd asks, “What shall we do?” Peter answers, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit” (Acts 2:38). The result follows immediately: “Those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls” (Acts 2:41).
The sequence is deliberate: faith → baptism → addition to the gathered community. This pattern repeats throughout Acts: belief in Samaria is followed by baptism (8:12); the Ethiopian eunuch requests baptism upon confessing Christ (8:36–38); the Philippian jailer believes and is baptized “at once” (16:33). The New Testament never presents a model of a believer who remains indefinitely unbaptized while being formally integrated into the life and oversight of a local church.
Baptism as the First Step of Obedient Discipleship
Christ’s Great Commission places baptism at the very beginning of the disciple-making process: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them… teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you” (Matt. 28:19–20). Baptism is not the capstone of Christian maturity; it is the initiation of it. It is the first commanded act of a new life in Christ.
Romans 6:3–4 further reveals its theological weight: in baptism, believers publicly identify with Christ’s death and resurrection, declaring that the old life is buried and the new has begun. To profess faith while willfully withholding baptism is not a neutral position. It is a contradiction. It claims allegiance to Christ while declining His first clear instruction.
Baptism and the Local Church’s Identity
Baptism does more than identify a believer with Christ; it identifies them with Christ’s body. Paul writes that “by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body” (1 Cor. 12:13). While this speaks of the Spirit’s invisible work, that reality is meant to be visibly embodied in the local church. In Acts 2, those baptized were “added” to a definable, gathered assembly.
Church membership is precisely this: the local church’s formal recognition that a person has trusted Christ and publicly aligned themselves with His people through the ordinance He appointed. If baptism is the biblical means of publicly entering into visible fellowship with the body of Christ, then granting membership without it severs the sign from the reality it represents. Membership becomes detached from the very act Christ designed to mark belonging.
The Problem with Optional Baptism
When a church treats baptism as recommended rather than required for membership, several ecclesiological problems follow:
- It legitimizes a category Scripture never acknowledges: the settled, unbaptized church member.
- It functionally downgrades Christ’s command from essential obedience to personal preference.
- It obscures the church’s visible identity, making membership a matter of affiliation rather than covenantal identification.
- It creates an artificial divide between faith and its first commanded expression, leaving believers in a state of prolonged disobedience.
A Clear Way Forward
To bring our practice into alignment with Scripture, our bylaws should reflect the biblical pattern. A revised statement might read:
“Membership shall be open to those who give credible testimony of personal faith in Jesus Christ, have followed the Lord in believer’s baptism, and commit to walk in fellowship and accountability with this assembly.”
This standard does not demand perfection; it demands direction. Pastoral wisdom may accommodate rare, extraordinary circumstances—such as severe physical limitation or immediate persecution—but these must remain carefully defined exceptions, never the norm that reshapes the rule.
Conclusion
This is not a debate over tradition, preference, or salvation. It is a matter of biblical order and pastoral fidelity. The New Testament consistently presents a clear trajectory: a person trusts Christ, is baptized, and is added to the local church. We do not require baptism because we believe it washes away sin. We require it because Christ commands it, the apostles practiced it, and the local church is called to recognize believers according to the pattern God has established.
Updating our bylaws to require believer’s baptism for membership does not burden the flock. It calls them into the fullness of obedience, clarity, and covenantal life that Christ intends for His church.